Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 20's score of 77.8. The iPhone XS is an extremely older cellphone than the ZTE Axon 20, but it's somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The iPhone XS has a sharper display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
ZTE Axon 20 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone XS features a bit superior processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 59% larger battery capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 features a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XS, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the ZTE Axon 20, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.