Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 20's global score of 77.8. Google Pixel 4's body is somewhat lighter than ZTE Axon 20, although it is a bit thicker and was released only 14 months before. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display. ZTE Axon 20 features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
ZTE Axon 20 has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a lot more mega pixels camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 4 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.