Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 20, with a global score of 81.3 against 77.8. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is a little bit thinner and much lighter than the ZTE Axon 20, even though it was released 3 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than ZTE Axon 20, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a much higher resolution camera, a way larger back camera sensor and better video frame rate.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 20 features longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.