Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than ZTE Axon 20, with an 87.1 score against 77.8. The LG Velvet is a a little lighter phone than ZTE Axon 20, but they have the same thickness. LG Velvet counts with a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2460px, the LG Velvet also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
LG Velvet features a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
ZTE Axon 20 has a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
LG Velvet counts with a bit superior battery life than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.