Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 20's 77.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than ZTE Axon 20, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. The ZTE Axon 20 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The ZTE Axon 20 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a way more megapixels back camera and a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. ZTE Axon 20 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.