Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than ZTE Axon 20, having a overall score of 98.9 against 77.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an a bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than the ZTE Axon 20.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better storage to store more apps and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery performance than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low light situations and a way larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 20, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.