Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 20, having an 81.2 score against 77.8. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is somewhat lighter than the ZTE Axon 20, although it is just a little thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a better screen than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a bit smaller screen and a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display. The ZTE Axon 20 has a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. ZTE Axon 20 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
ZTE Axon 20 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4220mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.