Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 20's general score of 77.8. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and much thicker cellphone than the ZTE Axon 20. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while ZTE Axon 20 has Android 10, so it provides a couple additional features.
ZTE Axon 20 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 20 also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The ZTE Axon 20 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The ZTE Axon 20 features a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4220mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the ZTE Axon 20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.