Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 389 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4220mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than ZTE Axon 20, with an 81.1 score against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide you very similar operating system features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is a little bit heavier and thicker than the ZTE Axon 20.
ZTE Axon 20 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both have similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
ZTE Axon 20 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery life than ZTE Axon 20, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 20 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same sensor size and a same resolution camera, the ZTE Axon 20 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.