Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aqua and Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 32000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 13.59 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 30 5G, getting a general score of 83.3 against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy S9's design is a little bit thicker but lighter than the ZTE Axon 30 5G. ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a lot lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display. The Galaxy S9 counts with a superior camera than ZTE Axon 30 5G, although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S9 has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The ZTE Axon 30 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.