Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's general score of 78.1. IPhone 8 Plus's construction is just a little bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it is a little bit heavier and was released many years before. IPhone 8 Plus has just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser and slower CPU cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. IPhone 8 Plus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 2691mAh. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution, a much better video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
IPhone 8 Plus costs more money than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.