Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 overall score. IPhone X is an extremely older device than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but Apple managed to build it a little lighter and a little thinner anyway. The iPhone X has a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The iPhone X has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Apple iPhone X costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.