Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with an 82 score against 78.1. IPhone XR is a older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Apple iPhone XR features a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR features a slightly better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a quite lower screen pixel density. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a superior camera than iPhone XR, because it has a camera with lot more MP, a bigger aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The iPhone XR costs exactly the same than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.