Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 score. Although Google Pixel 4 is older and just a little bit thicker than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage. Google Pixel 4 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 4 has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.