Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is much better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's overall score of 78.1. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has newer 14 version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11, providing the user some extra features and some performance improvements. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better processing unit than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a quite larger screen, a little greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a little higher 1280 x 2800 resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 1 TB internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with improved battery performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has a 5600mAh battery size instead of 4600mAh.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a little bit better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a way lower 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a way lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.