Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's global score of 78.1. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's construction is a bit thinner and lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a processor that is just as good as the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra one, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3300mAh. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.6 camera aperture, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a lot better resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.