Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a overall score of 87.1 against 78.1. The LG Velvet is a just a little lighter device than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit better processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG Velvet has a screen that is very similar to ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's screen, although the LG Velvet also has a quite larger display, a little higher screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution. LG Velvet counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.