Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's global score of 78.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is notably older than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's body is just a little bit thinner and lighter. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and Galaxy A50 both feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A50, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with much more megapixels. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.