Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a overall score of 85.5 against 78.1. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy A51 is a a little bit lighter device than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but they are 0.31inches thick. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra and Galaxy A51 both count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A51 has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A51 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.