Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's score of 78.1. Galaxy Note 3's design is somewhat lighter than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way higher resolution camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger diafragm aperture. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 44 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.