Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a 79.3 score against 78.1. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11. The Galaxy Note 5 design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Note 5 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.