Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having an 80.4 score against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition body has the same thickness than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but it is somewhat lighter. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.