Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a general score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. These phones include Android OS, but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra construction is a lot newer and thinner, but heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a sharper screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a way better video resolution and a much bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 64% more battery size.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S5 Sport. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.