Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-04 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a overall score of 83.3 against 78.1. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S9 is older and just a bit thicker than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy S9 has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 400 GB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S9 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.