Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, getting a 92.3 score against 78.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, even though it was released only 10 months before. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a little greater screen density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.