Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-27 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2705mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way better than the ZTE Axon 7 Mini, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 63.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a notably newer phone than ZTE Axon 7 Mini, although it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 7 Mini, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and ZTE Axon 7 Mini feature very similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a lot better camera than ZTE Axon 7 Mini, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much better video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 7 Mini, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 7 Mini, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2705mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the ZTE Axon 7 Mini.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.