Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-26 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3250mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than ZTE Axon 7, with a score of 81.1 against 68.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the ZTE Axon 7. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while ZTE Axon 7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The ZTE Axon 7 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 7, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has more storage for applications and games than ZTE Axon 7, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better battery duration than ZTE Axon 7, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3250mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.