Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-09-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the ZTE Axon Elite, getting a general score of 81.3 against 60.6. LG V35 ThinQ has a superior processing power than ZTE Axon Elite, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster). LG V35 ThinQ counts with a screen that's very similar to the ZTE Axon Elite one, although the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher pixel density, a quite larger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photos and videos than ZTE Axon Elite, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a back facing camera with more MP. LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than ZTE Axon Elite, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery life than ZTE Axon Elite, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than ZTE Axon Elite, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.