Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.08 x 2.96 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is slightly better than the ZTE Axon Lux, with a overall score of 76.6 against 70.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a newer and just a little thinner device than ZTE Axon Lux, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has older 10 version while ZTE Axon Lux has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the processing unit in ZTE Axon Lux, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 1 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The ZTE Axon Lux counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
ZTE Axon Lux has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a better camera than ZTE Axon Lux, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better battery performance than ZTE Axon Lux, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.