Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| 2015-08-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is way better than ZTE Axon Pro, with a global score of 82.9 against 67.3. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is way newer and thinner, but also heavier than ZTE Axon Pro. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bit higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a little larger screen. The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has a lower video quality and a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Google Pixel 4 XL and ZTE Axon Pro both have similar storage for applications and games, both have equal 64 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with greater battery performance than ZTE Axon Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also cheap compared to the ZTE Axon Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.