Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.3 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-08-03 | 2015-07-28 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a global score of 73.8, which is slightly better than ZTE Axon Pro's score of 67.3. Even being the best in this review, Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) is a thicker and just a little heavier device than the ZTE Axon Pro. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a superior storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 128 GB. ZTE Axon Pro features a better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit better camera than ZTE Axon Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The ZTE Axon Pro and the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) have very similar batteries.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.