Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.95 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is way better than ZTE Axon Pro, getting a score of 90.8 against 67.3. The Galaxy S20 FE is a a lot newer and thinner phone than ZTE Axon Pro, but it is also just a little heavier. ZTE Axon Pro counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Axon Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than ZTE Axon Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE has a really longer battery performance than ZTE Axon Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a superior camera than ZTE Axon Pro, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lesser mega-pixels camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Galaxy S20 FE is a little more expensive than the ZTE Axon Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.