Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-10-31 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.42 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is way better than ZTE Blade Max View's 65.4 global score. The Galaxy A50 design is just a little bit heavier but just a little thinner than ZTE Blade Max View, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid display than ZTE Blade Max View, because it has a quite larger display, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit faster CPU than ZTE Blade Max View, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A50 has a better memory to store more games and applications than ZTE Blade Max View, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A50's battery duration is just as good as the ZTE Blade Max View one. Galaxy A50 takes a bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Blade Max View, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture and a lot more MP back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than ZTE Blade Max View, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.