Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.4 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.0 |
| 2018-10-31 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.42 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than ZTE Blade Max View, with a overall score of 71.5 against 65.4. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version and ZTE Blade Max View has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker cellphone than ZTE Blade Max View.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a little sharper screen than ZTE Blade Max View, although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, a really smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. The ZTE Blade Max View has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of cores.
ZTE Blade Max View counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Blade Max View also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Blade Max View counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the ZTE Blade Max View also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a way larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments.
The ZTE Blade Max View counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.