Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than ZTE Blade S6, having a general score of 87.1 against 59.9. ZTE Blade S6 counts with a bit superior processor than LG Velvet, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Blade S6 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processor.
The LG Velvet has a bit better screen than ZTE Blade S6, because it has a really bigger screen, a greater display density and a much higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The LG Velvet captures a lot better pictures and videos than ZTE Blade S6, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG Velvet has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than ZTE Blade S6, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG Velvet features a really longer battery life than ZTE Blade S6, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 2400mAh.
LG Velvet costs a bit more than the ZTE Blade S6, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.