Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.9 | 65.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-28 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.67 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 255.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 7.81 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2.4 is a bit better than the ZTE Blade S6, having a 65.6 score against 59.9. These phones have Android OS, but Nokia 2.4 has newer 11 version and ZTE Blade S6 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. The ZTE Blade S6 has just a little better hardware performance than Nokia 2.4, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Blade S6 also has a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor.
ZTE Blade S6 has just a bit better looking display than Nokia 2.4, because although it has a little bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Nokia 2.4 features a superior camera than ZTE Blade S6. Both of them have a same resolution back-facing camera.
Nokia 2.4 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than ZTE Blade S6, because it has more internal memory. The Nokia 2.4 counts with a much longer battery duration than ZTE Blade S6, because it has an 88 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 2.4 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.