Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.4 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-07-14 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.12 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 99.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is way better than the ZTE Blade Spark, having a general score of 71.5 against 57.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has the older 4.0 version and ZTE Blade Spark has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a much lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than ZTE Blade Spark.
Galaxy S III Cricket has just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Blade Spark, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better looking display than ZTE Blade Spark, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1280 x 720px resolution, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a bit better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Blade Spark, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory. ZTE Blade Spark features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a greater camera than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 8 MP resolution and a lower (Full HD) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs a little more money than ZTE Blade Spark, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.