Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.59 x 2.74 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6735 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (640 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 440 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the ZTE Blade V6, getting a global score of 81.3 against 58.5. LG V35 ThinQ is a way heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the ZTE Blade V6. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than ZTE Blade V6, because it has much more pixels per inch of display, a larger screen and a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE Blade V6, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior hardware performance than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2200mAh. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than ZTE Blade V6, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a camera in the back with more mega pixels, a lot better video quality and a way larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than ZTE Blade V6, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.