Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.59 x 2.74 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6735 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (640 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.8 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 440 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is much better than ZTE Blade V6, having a score of 80.7 against 58.5. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is way heavier and somewhat thicker than the ZTE Blade V6. These devices have the same Android 5.0 OS (Operating System). Galaxy Note 3 has a greater hardware performance than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a graphics processor, 1 GB more RAM and 7 more cores.
Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better looking screen than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a greater display density, a lot higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit larger display. Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better camera than ZTE Blade V6, and although they both have the same aperture, a same size back camera sensor and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than ZTE Blade V6, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a really longer battery performance than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the ZTE Blade V6, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.