Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.59 x 2.74 x 0.27 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6735 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (640 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 440 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is way better than ZTE Blade V6, with an 81.9 score against 58.5. Galaxy S8 Active is a notably heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone than ZTE Blade V6. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better display than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a much better pixels density.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a greater performance than ZTE Blade V6, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S8 Active takes a bit better photos and videos than ZTE Blade V6, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Blade V6, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a way better battery life than ZTE Blade V6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S8 Active is also cheaper than the ZTE Blade V6, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.