Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-01-18 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.36 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a global score of 71.5, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Blade V8 Pro's 65.2 overall score. The Galaxy S III Cricket construction is extremely lighter and a little bit thinner than the ZTE Blade V8 Pro. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Blade V8 Pro, although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, a little bit smaller screen and a way worse 1280 x 720px resolution.
The ZTE Blade V8 Pro features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the ZTE Blade V8 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB. The ZTE Blade V8 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 6 more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
ZTE Blade V8 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size. ZTE Blade V8 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.