Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.8 | 34.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| -- | 2008-03-31 |
| 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches | 4.00 x 2.13 x 0.65 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 4.23 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 4.73 |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.5 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
LG enV2 has an overall score of 34.8, which is a little bit better than the ZTE F160's 31.8 global score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the LG enV2 body is noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier than the ZTE F160. LG enV2 has a little sharper screen than ZTE F160. Both of them have a screen of the same size, the same 240 x 320 resolution and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
LG enV2 and ZTE F160 feature incredibly similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core processor. ZTE F160 and LG enV2 have very similar memory capacity for applications and games, although the LG enV2 has no slot for SD memory cards. The ZTE F160 takes slightly better photos and videos than LG enV2, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera.
LG enV2 has a little longer battery duration than ZTE F160, because it has a 16% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG enV2 is also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.