Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.833.7
Basic Information
ZTEMotorola
--2011-05-13
4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches4.20 x 2.30 x 0.60 inches
3.53 ounces4.00 ounces
--Black
$ 90.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)220 x 176 pixels
--TFT
167 pixels per inch141 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.85.7
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--8,19 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
00.2
Camera
3.00 MP0.30 MP
5.063.63
UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM--
SIM--
0.50
Battery Life
820mAh Li-Ion Battery1130mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--100 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.322.8
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Motorola Clutch + i475 is just a bit better than the ZTE F160, getting a score of 33.7 against 31.8. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Motorola Clutch + i475's construction is somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than ZTE F160. ZTE F160 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240, a bigger screen and a just a little better pixels density.

Motorola Clutch + i475's processing unit is very similar to the processor in ZTE F160, both have 0 cores. Motorola Clutch + i475 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE F160, although it has no slot for SD memory cards. The Motorola Clutch + i475 features a much longer battery life than ZTE F160, because it has a 38 percent more battery size.

ZTE F160 shoots greater photos and videos than Motorola Clutch + i475, because it has a much better 3 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.

The Motorola Clutch + i475 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.