Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.8 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-10 |
| 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 167 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 2.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is way better than the ZTE F160, having a 64.8 score against 31.8. The Nokia 3.1 A body is notably heavier but somewhat thinner than ZTE F160. Nokia 3.1 A features a much sharper screen than ZTE F160, because it has a lot larger display, a much better 720 x 1440px resolution and a lot better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than ZTE F160. The Nokia 3.1 A features a much faster processing unit than ZTE F160, because it has a larger number of faster cores. The Nokia 3.1 A has a way better battery lifetime than ZTE F160, because it has a 265 percent greater battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior camera than ZTE F160, because it has a much better 8 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Nokia 3.1 A and the ZTE F160 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.