Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.834.2
Basic Information
ZTENokia
--2008-04-22
4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches
3.53 ounces2.75 ounces
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
167 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.4
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
5.064.73
UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.50.3
Battery Life
820mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--406 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
2.322.64
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is a little bit better than the ZTE F160, getting a 34.2 score against 31.8. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is a a little bit thinner and way lighter phone than the ZTE F160. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE F160, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 320 x 240 resolution, the Nokia 5220 XpressMusic also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's processor is very similar to the ZTE F160 one, both of them have the same number of cores. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features a very superior memory for games and applications than ZTE F160, although it has no slot for an SD memory card. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has greater battery life than ZTE F160, because it has a 24 percent larger battery size.

ZTE F160 features a bit better camera than Nokia 5220 XpressMusic, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is also cheaper than the ZTE F160, which makes it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.