Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31.8 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-02-16 |
| 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 5.06 | 3.63 |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.24 |
Comparison review
Samsung E2210 is a little bit better than ZTE F160, having a 34.1 score against 31.8. The Samsung E2210 body is lighter but extremely thicker than ZTE F160. Samsung E2210 counts with a CPU that's just as good as the ZTE F160 one, both of them have 0 cores. The ZTE F160 features just a bit better looking display than Samsung E2210, because it has a better pixel quantity in each inch of display, a way better 320 x 240px resolution and a much larger display.
Samsung E2210 has a much better memory to install applications and games than ZTE F160, although it has no SD memory slot. ZTE F160 captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung E2210, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels. ZTE F160 features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung E2210, because it has 820mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung E2210 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.