Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 31.8 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.2 |
| -- | 2014-03-15 |
| 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.53 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 540 x 960 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.8 | 7.8 |
| processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| -- | 1 GB RAM |
| GPU | Yes GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0.5 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 2.32 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S3 Slim is a lot better than the ZTE F160, having a overall score of 60.4 against 31.8. Galaxy S3 Slim's design is noticeably heavier but thinner than ZTE F160. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim counts with a much better looking screen than ZTE F160, because it has a lot larger display, a way better 960 x 540 pixels resolution and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S3 Slim has a very superior processing unit than ZTE F160, because it has a larger number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim takes much better photographs and videos than ZTE F160, because it has a back camera with way more MP. The Galaxy S3 Slim has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than ZTE F160.
Galaxy S3 Slim has a really longer battery performance than ZTE F160, because it has a 156% greater battery size.
Galaxy S3 Slim costs exactly the same than the ZTE F160.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.