Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 2013-05-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Saltwell (Dual-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 544 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than the ZTE Grand X2 In, having an 83.3 score against 52.5. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a faster processor than ZTE Grand X2 In, because it has 6 more cpu cores and 3 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a slightly better looking display than ZTE Grand X2 In, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a larger screen and a much higher display density.
Galaxy S9 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than ZTE Grand X2 In, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB and 56 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots greater photos and videos than ZTE Grand X2 In, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lot higher 12 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S9 has a much better battery duration than ZTE Grand X2 In, because it has a 50% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit more expensive than the ZTE Grand X2 In, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.