Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-26 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.31 x 2.60 x 0.39 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.71 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is way better than the ZTE Maven, having a overall score of 79.5 against 51.4. The Samsung Galaxy S7 design is somewhat heavier but a lot thinner than ZTE Maven, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. The Galaxy S7 features a faster processor than ZTE Maven, because it has 3 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better looking screen than ZTE Maven, because it has a way greater display density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than ZTE Maven, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a way better battery life than ZTE Maven, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better camera than ZTE Maven, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S7 costs a bit more money than the ZTE Maven, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.