Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38 | 39 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 2.3.4 | Symbian 9.4 |
| -- | 2010-08-24 |
| 4.41 x 2.44 x 0.54 inches | 4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 3.77 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White |
| $ 60.00 | $ 59.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 360 x 640 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 165 pixels per inch | 262 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Resistive |
| 6.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7627 chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor |
| -- | 128 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 6.75 | 6.48 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 52,22 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.4 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.61 | 5.28 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.5 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 7.7 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 5250 has a global score of 39, which is a bit better than ZTE Score M's 38 global score. Nokia 5250 counts with Symbian 9.4 OS, and ZTE Score M has Android 2.3.4 OS. The Nokia 5250 is a incredibly lighter but a bit thicker phone than ZTE Score M. ZTE Score M features a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 5250. Both have a Single-Core CPU.
Nokia 5250 counts with a more vivid display than ZTE Score M, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixels density and a higher 640 x 360 resolution. ZTE Score M takes clearer photos and videos than Nokia 5250, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (VGA) video quality, the ZTE Score M also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Nokia 5250 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than ZTE Score M. The ZTE Score M counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Nokia 5250, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity against 1000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 5250 is also cheaper than the ZTE Score M, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.